Explosive New Video Challenges Pentagon’s Findings on Kabul Airport Attack
In a shocking twist, CNN has unearthed game-changing footage that directly contradicts two Pentagon investigations into the ISIS-K suicide bombing at Kabul airport in August 2021. This tragic event marked the heart-wrenching end to America’s longest war, resulting in the deaths of 13 US service members and approximately 170 Afghan civilians seeking refuge from the Taliban.
For years, the US military has maintained that the devastation was caused by a single explosion, dismissing reports of gunfire as mere confusion amidst the chaos. However, exclusive video captured by a Marine’s GoPro camera reveals a chilling truth – there was a significant amount of gunfire on that fateful day.
Eyewitness accounts from a dozen military personnel who were present at the scene paint a vivid picture of the harrowing events that unfolded. An Afghan doctor, speaking on the record for the first time, recounted pulling bullets from wounded victims and confirming multiple deaths from gunshot wounds.
The new evidence not only challenges the Pentagon’s credibility but also raises troubling questions about the true nature of the attack. The blast, which occurred at 5:36 p.m. on August 26, 2021, resulted in the deadliest incident for Afghan civilians and US troops in over a decade.
In the midst of the chaos outside Kabul airport, where desperate Afghans sought refuge, the scene was one of desperation and despair. Former translators and other allies of NATO forces waded through sewage water, hoping for a chance to escape the impending Taliban rule.
While the Pentagon has maintained that all casualties were due to the explosive device and its shrapnel, the newly uncovered footage tells a different story. The video, which captures multiple episodes of gunfire following the blast, contradicts the military’s assertion of only three bursts of gunfire.
The video footage, analyzed by experts, reveals at least 11 instances of gunfire over a four-minute span, totaling a minimum of 43 shots. This evidence challenges the Pentagon’s narrative and sheds new light on the tragic events that unfolded outside Kabul airport.
As the investigation continues, the questions surrounding the Kabul airport attack grow more pressing. The truth remains elusive, obscured by conflicting accounts and mounting evidence of a far more complex and disturbing reality. Marine video analysis reveals potential gunshots following Kabul airport bombing
A detailed analysis of videos taken in the aftermath of the Kabul airport bombing last year has raised questions about potential gunfire from US and coalition forces. The video footage, obtained by CNN, shows Marines aiding wounded Afghans while also firing a CS gas canister towards the area near the blast.
Location data and metadata from the videos indicate they were filmed in close proximity to each other, suggesting a comprehensive view of the events surrounding the attack. Furthermore, audio analysis using an algorithm revealed peaks consistent with firearm noises in 16 instances, aligning with previous reports of gunfire.
Despite these findings, the Pentagon’s investigations have not referenced the video in question, raising concerns about the thoroughness of the official inquiries. The Pentagon did release a brief clip of the blast itself, but the source of that footage remains unclear.
In response to the video analysis, the Pentagon maintained its initial findings from the Abbey Gate investigation, stating that there was no evidence of a complex attack involving gunfire from militants post-blast. However, accounts from Afghan witnesses and medical reports suggest otherwise, with reports of civilians being targeted by gunfire after the explosion.
Dr. Sayeed Ahmadi, who treated victims at the Wazir Akhbar Khan hospital, described treating patients with gunshot wounds in addition to blast injuries. Despite his firsthand experience, Ahmadi was never approached by American investigators for his testimony on the events of that night.
As Marine survivors continue to grapple with their trauma and conflicting narratives about the attack, dissent among servicemen has grown. Reports of gunfire and perceived threats from militants have been dismissed as symptoms of blast concussion, but testimonies from multiple witnesses suggest a more complex reality.
The discrepancies between official accounts and eyewitness testimonies underscore the need for a comprehensive and transparent investigation into the events of that fateful night at Kabul airport. The voices of those directly impacted by the attack must be heard and taken into account in any further inquiries. Marine Eyewitness Reveals Details of Chaos and Gunfire After Kabul Blast
In a shocking turn of events, a courageous Marine has come forward as the first American eyewitness to reveal details of the chaos and gunfire that ensued after the devastating Kabul blast. Speaking out of conscience and requesting anonymity for fear of reprisals, this Marine described shots fired from where US personnel were located in the aftermath of the explosion.
The Witness Account
The Marine recounted that the burst of gunfire heard after the explosion originated from the area around the Abbey Gate sniper tower, where US Marines were positioned. While he could not confirm whether the Marines had fired directly into the crowd of Afghan civilians, he adamantly stated, “They would not have fired into the air.”
According to the Marine, there was a common understanding among the troops to refrain from firing warning shots as they could pose a risk to civilians. Despite not witnessing any US military personnel open fire, he described the tense atmosphere and the immediate response of his colleagues under attack.
Marine’s Emotional Response
The Marine grew emotional when discussing the lack of transparency surrounding the Pentagon’s investigations into the incident. He criticized the dismissal of accounts from US personnel who recalled gunfire as a product of TBI, labeling it a “pathetic excuse.” He expressed his deepest sympathies to the Afghan families affected by the tragic events.
Eyewitness Testimonies
Several other Marines anonymously corroborated the Marine’s account, describing gunfire and chaos in the aftermath of the bombing. One Marine recounted hearing suppressed rifle fire nearby, while another witnessed snapping sounds overhead after the blast. Social media accounts also shared testimonies from Marines who opened fire in response to the attack.
The Truth Unveiled
As more eyewitnesses come forward to shed light on the events that unfolded in Kabul, the truth behind the chaos and gunfire is slowly being unveiled. Despite the challenges and uncertainties faced by those on the ground, their accounts provide a crucial perspective on the tragic events that transpired on that fateful day. Unleashing Chaos: Eyewitness Account Reveals Terrifying Moments of Deadly Shooting
In a chilling revelation, a witness broke down as he recounted the harrowing moment when he started shooting at the alleged gunman. “And I just started shooting at the dude,” he added, his voice trembling with emotion.
Sanchez, the witness, refused to provide further details to CNN, adding another layer of mystery to the already perplexing case. It remains unclear if Sanchez personally witnessed the supposed militant gunman opening fire, adding to the cloud of uncertainty surrounding the incident.
The Pentagon’s narrative also comes under scrutiny, with significant gaps and inconsistencies in the evidence they have presented. Only five minutes of edited drone footage from the aftermath has been released, supposedly supporting their claims that no gunfire hit anyone.
Congressional hearings with top military officials shed more light on the situation, with Congressman Darrell Issa confronting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley and Central Command Gen. Kenneth “Frank” McKenzie with a list of unpublished videos. The Pentagon had acknowledged holding these videos under a Freedom of Information Act request, raising further questions about the transparency of the investigation.
Another military survivor, speaking to CNN, revealed the frustration of being silenced by leadership for two years. He described the investigations as a means to control the narrative, saying, “Shut your mouth. We’ll talk for you.” The truth behind the deadly shooting remains shrouded in secrecy and manipulation, leaving more questions than answers.
