Angelina Jolie Ordered to Release Eight Years’ Worth of NDAs in Legal Battle with Brad Pitt Over French Winery
In a recent court ruling in Los Angeles, Angelina Jolie has been mandated to produce all non-disclosure agreements spanning eight years as part of her ongoing legal dispute with her ex-husband Brad Pitt regarding their French winery, Château Miraval.
Judge’s Decision
Judge Lia Martin has ruled that Jolie must provide all NDAs associated with her ownership of the winery, which she co-owned with Pitt. The couple acquired Château Miraval in 2014, and Jolie sold her shares in the business. However, she claims that Pitt prevented her from doing so, leading to the current legal battle.
Legal Maneuvering
After Jolie filed a motion in April to release communications from Pitt’s legal team demanding her signature on a comprehensive NDA before selling her shares, Pitt’s lawyers retaliated by requesting the court to compel Jolie to disclose all NDAs she has signed in the past. This request has now been granted, and Jolie must provide the NDAs within 60 days.
Allegations and Counterclaims
According to Pitt’s legal team, the released NDAs could undermine Jolie’s case and reveal breaches of her contractual obligations to Pitt. These legal documents may shed light on the circumstances surrounding Jolie’s sale of the winery shares to Russian oligarch Yuri Shefler.
Publicized Rift
Although the legal dispute may appear to be a simple business transaction, it is rooted in a highly publicized rift between the former power couple. Jolie has accused Pitt of physical and verbal abuse, a claim that has fueled their contentious divorce proceedings.
Background
Jolie and Pitt’s relationship started amidst controversy in 2005, leading to their marriage in Château Miraval in 2014. The couple, who share six children, announced their separation in 2016, culminating in a finalized divorce in 2019.
Search for Truth
As the legal battle continues, both parties seem willing to comply with the court’s orders. Jolie’s lawyer has expressed readiness to release the requested NDAs, suggesting that this development could lead to further revelations related to the case. The truth behind the allegations and accusations remains to be uncovered as the legal drama unfolds.
